Free Early Access

Test the flow.
Get the verdict.

Tell us the most important thing a user needs to be able to do in your web app. QAVerdict independently tests that critical flow with Playwright and returns a clear PASS or FAIL with evidence.

Test My Critical Flow

One flow. No cost. No account needed.

AI-assisted functional smoke testing, with human review. Requests are reviewed before a test is scheduled—not an instant self-service test runner.

PLAIN ENGLISH→PLAYWRIGHT→FUNCTIONAL TEST→PASS / FAIL + EVIDENCE

How it works

One important flow.
A focused check.

For solo developers, small SaaS teams, AI-assisted app builders, and developers without dedicated QA support.

Share your app

Submit your web app URL. Use a staging environment with test data where possible.

Describe one flow

Tell us what a user needs to do and what a successful result looks like—in plain English.

We run the check

After reviewing the scope with you, we use AI assistance to prepare a Playwright test, review it, and execute the flow.

Get the verdict

Receive a PASS or FAIL for the agreed flow, with the steps checked and useful failure evidence.

If access or the test environment prevents execution, we report that blocker—not a fabricated PASS or FAIL. Early Access checks are coordinated individually.

Choose your critical flow

What must work
for your users?

Start with one clear journey and one observable outcome. We agree the scope before running a test.

Log in and reach the dashboard.
Create and save a project.
Submit a contact form.
Select a pricing plan and reach signup.
Search for a product and open its details.

A smoke check, not a certification.

Free Early Access covers one agreed browser-based functional flow. It does not include comprehensive security, API, accessibility, performance, visual regression, or full regression testing. A PASS does not certify your whole application or establish that a release is safe to ship.

Free Early Access

Request a Free
Critical Flow Check

Share one flow you want independently checked. We’ll review your request and contact you at the email you provide to confirm scope, access, and next steps.

No payment. No account. No passwords here.

All fields are required except Additional notes.

NameEmail

Application URL

Use a public web address, preferably staging. Don’t include secret tokens or credential-bearing links.

Critical user flow in plain English

Example: Log in with a test account arranged separately, create a project named Test Project, save it, and verify it appears on the dashboard.

Expected successful result

Does this flow require authentication?

Yes No

If yes, we’ll contact you separately to arrange secure test credentials. Never enter passwords, API keys, payment details, or personal customer data in this form.

Additional notes (optional)I confirm that I own, control, or am authorized to have this application tested, and authorize QAVerdict to perform the agreed functional flow check.

This is functional QA testing—not unauthorized security testing. Requests are stored privately to coordinate your check, with basic abuse prevention. No public submission list. Don’t include secrets or sensitive data. Contact hello@qaverdict.com about your request or deletion.

The engineering behind QAVerdict

Built by Caleb Stroman.

QA Automation Engineer · SDET

QAVerdict is part of my AI QA Lab: a focused application of browser automation, clear assertions, and useful test evidence. The Early Access workflow uses AI-assisted test generation with human review, Playwright, and TypeScript—not an AI guarantee of correctness.

This repository contains the site, intake backend, and automated site checks. Customer-flow tests are prepared separately after scope is agreed. Screenshots, traces, and reproducible steps support the findings; broader CI/CD integration is future work.

Open to QA Automation Engineer and SDET opportunities

Let’s talk quality engineering.

hello@qaverdict.com LinkedIn Source & tests on GitHub

Product direction · Not included in Early Access

A focused start.
A longer-term vision.

The first offer is one critical-flow check. The broader release-decision work remains a portfolio concept, not a delivered product capability.

Explore the original release-verdict concept

Future platform concept

From test result to release call.

A future platform could bring test evidence, defect context, and risk-based recommendations together. The original checkout demonstration explores how a team might connect coverage to a release decision.

Possible future capabilities—not current coverage

Evidence aggregationRisk-based coverageRelease recordsCI/CD integration